Jimmy Kimmel Should Follow Steve Allen’s Lead in Comedy and Politics
Lessons from Steve Allen for Modern Late-Night TV
Jimmy Kimmel might benefit from studying the pioneering approach of the creator of late-night television, Steve Allen. During research for a book, I discovered Allen’s personal letters, which reveal his dedication to respectful dialogue, especially with conservatives, contrasting sharply with Kimmel’s often confrontational style.
Allen introduced the “man on the street” interviews, which modern shows now call “Pedestrian Question.” Despite sharing progressive beliefs with Kimmel, Allen maintained friendships with Republicans, including prominent figures like William F. Buckley.
He supported conservative causes and contributed to national discussions, including co-authoring “Dialogues in Americanism” and writing an influential 1964 letter urging the Right to police its extremist rhetoric. Allen believed responsible discourse could foster positive change, unlike the often dismissive or angry tone seen today.
Allen’s exchanges with Frank Meyer, a former Communist turned conservative, exemplify this constructive spirit. Meyer criticized radical groups like the John Birch Society, and Allen shared a speech condemning left-wing extremism. Their dialogue showcased how liberals and conservatives can collaborate against harmful rhetoric, influencing their respective communities.
However, Allen warned against turning comedy into ideological weaponry. His early “Tonight Show” was lively and fraternity-like, but NBC’s misjudged the audience’s preference for light entertainment, leading to shifts toward more serious and less humorous programming.
Modern late-night hosts, including Kimmel, seem to repeat these mistakes by turning humor into ideological battles, reducing authenticity. Kimmel’s reliance on polarized content risks alienating viewers and undermining comedy’s original purpose.
Where Allen saw late-night as an enduring vehicle for entertainment, today’s shows often drift into politicization, threatening their longevity. Recognizing Allen’s example underscores the importance of comedy as a form of entertainment rather than political weapon.
Ultimately, Allen’s legacy reminds us that respectful dialogue and genuine humor can foster better societal understanding—lessons that could rejuvenate the genre and restore its original purpose.