Judge Orders Construction Halt at Florida’s ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Detention Center

Federal Court Orders Construction Halt of Florida’s Migrant Detention Facility Expansion

A federal judge has issued a 14-day suspension on the construction activities at a controversial migrant detention facility in Florida, known as “Alligator Alcatraz.” This pause does not affect the ongoing operation of the facility, which continues to hold Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainees, but it restricts any new construction or infrastructure development during this period.

The judge, Kathleen M. Williams, responded to a lawsuit by environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe, claiming that the project had not undergone necessary environmental impact assessments regarding the wetlands and native species in the Florida Everglades. The plaintiffs argued that construction violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which mandates federal agencies to evaluate environmental consequences for major projects.

The facility, located on a former airport site and built rapidly over eight days, was inaugurated last month under emergency powers invoked by the state’s governor. It is designed to eventually accommodate 4,000 migrants, with current capacity for 2,000. Despite the court order, officials maintain that operations are ongoing; a spokesman for the state emphasized that deportation efforts continue unabated.

Aerial view of the Alligator Alcatraz ICE detention center in Florida.
The detention center, located in the Florida Everglades, is expected to hold up to 4,000 migrants once completed.

Proponents of the project argue that the construction falls under state jurisdiction, thus NEPA review is unnecessary. Florida officials have asserted that the facility’s construction and operation are state matters, while environmental advocates contend the federal government’s authority over immigration makes NEPA applicable regardless.

While the court’s ruling temporarily halts further development, officials state that deportation operations persist, and the facility remains functional. Critics emphasize the environmental concerns, noting that the construction jeopardizes valuable ecological restoration work in the area.