State Dept. Cuts 1,300+ Staff in Major Overhaul

U.S. State Department Initiates Over 1,300 Staff Layoffs Amid Reorganization

The State Department has begun eliminating more than 1,300 positions as part of a strategic effort to reduce its workforce size. The layoffs involve approximately 1,107 civil servants and 246 foreign service officers, affecting roles both within the United States and abroad.

Employees received official notices, informing them that their positions were being “abolished.” Many departing staff members were seen leaving the department’s headquarters, with supporters gathered outside applauding their service. Some employees appeared emotional as they bid farewell.

A tearful woman is comforted by a man as colleagues applaud nearby.
Supporters cheered as employees left the department’s headquarters.

The department explained the staff reductions as targeted “to non-core functions, duplicative or redundant offices.” Foreign service officers affected will be on administrative leave for 120 days before their positions are terminated, while civil servants will have a 60-day separation period.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the layoffs, asserting they will make the department “more efficient and more focused.” He clarified that the changes involve eliminating positions, not just personnel, and emphasized that some bureau closures are a part of this effort.

The reorganization plan, submitted to Congress, proposes an 18% reduction in U.S.-based staff and includes shutting down approximately 300 divisions and offices. These include units that oversaw operations related to Afghanistan and the resettlement of Afghan nationals assisting U.S. military efforts, which critics argue could weaken U.S. diplomatic influence during a period of global instability.

A laid-off State Department employee is comforted outside the Harry S. Truman building.
More than 1,300 staff members are expected to be laid off as part of the department’s restructuring.

Concerns have been raised by diplomatic unions, which criticize the layoffs amid international uncertainty. They argue the reductions are based on staffing locations rather than merit or departmental needs and warn that such cuts could harm U.S. global interests.