Juror Expresses Confidence in Karen Read’s Innocence

During her second trial, one juror stated that he believes Karen Read is entirely innocent of the charges related to the death of her boyfriend, Boston officer John O’Keefe. While some jurors initially suspected she might be guilty, consensus was eventually reached.

Jason, a juror, shared with TMZ that the jury was divided—some believed she was definitely innocent, while others found reasonable doubt to justify an acquittal on the more serious charges. He emphasized that the “poor investigation” played a key role in the decision, as authorities failed to prove she hit O’Keefe with her vehicle.

Karen Read leaving the courthouse after the verdict. — Karen Read was found not guilty of all serious charges and only received a sentence for driving under the influence.

Jason expressed that he did not base his verdict on reasonable doubt but on the evidence, which he felt was insufficient to prove Read’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite initial moments of suspicion, he firmly believes she was innocent and that she was scapegoated.

Support and External Factors

He acknowledged the intense pressure from supporters gathered outside the courthouse, which added stress to the jury. Jason stated that while the large crowd increased the stress, it had no influence on the jury’s final decision.

Protesters outside the courthouse. — Supporters of Karen Read outside the Norfolk County courthouse during the trial process.

He also noted uncertainty about how O’Keefe died and expressed skepticism regarding allegations of corruption, asserting that the evidence was not enough to convict her conclusively.